Infracción de deber y autoría - una crítica a la teoría del dominio del hecho

Urs Kindhäuser

doi:10.5354/rej.v0i14.28552

Articles received by April 30 can be published in the first semester, and those received by September 15 can be published in the corresponding second-semester issue.

Duty violation and primary criminal participation. Critical approach of the doctrine of deed-control

Authors

Urs Kindhäuser Catedrático y Director del Instituto de Derecho Penal de la Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn. Profesor honorario de la Universidad de Piura. Doctor honoris causa en la Universidad de Huánuco

No. 14 (2011)

https://doi.org/10.5354/rej.v0i14.28552

Abstract

The article critically reviews the so called "doctrine of deed-control"(Tatherrschaftlehre), arguing that it cannot offer a plausible criterion for the attribution ofprimary criminal responsibility. After setting forward a different conceptual proposal,grounded on a the notions of norm, duty and action, the article examines the way inwhich such a model can help to clarify the structure of more complex forms of criminalresponsibility, including not only the complete realm of complicity but also criminalnegligence.

Keywords:

deed-control, norm, action, duty, complicity, negligence

Downloads

Altmetrics

How to Cite

Kindhäuser, U. (2011). Duty violation and primary criminal participation. Critical approach of the doctrine of deed-control. Revista De Estudios De La Justicia, (14), pp. 41–52. https://doi.org/10.5354/rej.v0i14.28552

Duty violation and primary criminal participation. Critical approach of the doctrine of deed-control

Authors

Abstract

Keywords:

Downloads

Make a Submission

Language

Information

Developed By

Current Issue

indexado

publique